Na het downloaden van de ASN Filter Designer willen de meeste mensen gewoon met de tool spelen, om een gevoel te krijgen of het voor hen werkt. Maar hoe ga je aan de slag met de ASN Filter Designer? Op basis van goede gebruikersfeedback wordt ASNFD v4.4 nu geleverd met het UI experience 2020-pakket. Dit pakket bevat gedetailleerde coachingstips, een verbeterde gebruikerservaring en stap-voor-stap instructies om je op weg te helpen met je ontwerp.

Een snel overzicht van de ASN Filter Designer v4.4 vindt je hieronder, een geweldige tool voorDSP IIR/FIR digitaal filterdesign!

De ASN Filter Designer heeft een snelle, intuïtieve gebruikersinterface. Ontwerp interactief, valideer en implementeer jouw uw digitale filter binnen enkele minuten in plaats van uren. Het kan echter moeilijk zijn om een eerste begin te maken met DSP-filterontwerp, vooral wanneer je geen diepgaande kennis hebt van digitale signaalverwerking. De meeste mensen willen gewoon experimenteren met een tool om een gevoel te krijgen of het voor hen werkt (ja, natuurlijk zijn er tutorials en video’s). Maar waar begin je dan?

Start onmiddellijk met experimenteren met het filterontwerp

Daarom hebben we het UI Experience 2020-pakket ontwikkeld. Op basis van de feedback van de gebruikers hebben we gedetailleerde tooltips en animaties van de belangrijkste functionaliteiten gemaakt. Binnen enkele minuten krijgt u een kickstart in functionaliteiten zoals chart zoom, panning en design markers.

Gebaseerd op de feedback van de gebruiker bevat het UI Experience 2020-pakket:

Uitgebreide coachingtips

Gedetailleerde uitleg over ontwerpmethoden en soorten filters

Verbeterde gebruikerservaring:

cursors

animaties

visuele effecten

Links naar gedetailleerde werkende oplossingen, tutorials en stap-voor-stap instructies

De feedback van de gebruikersgemeenschap is zeer positief! Door het verstrekken van gedetailleerde tooltips en animaties van de belangrijkste functionaliteit, is de eerste stap van het ontwerpen van een filter met jouw gewenste specificaties aanzienlijk vereenvoudigd.

Begin dus meteen met de ASN Filterontwerper en bespaar tot 75% op jouw ontwikkelingskosten!

DSP voor ingenieurs: de ASN Filter Designer is de ideale tool om de sensordata snel te analyseren en te filteren. Maak een algoritme binnen enkele uren in plaats van dagen. Wanneer u met sensorgegevens werkt, herkent u deze uitdagingen waarschijnlijk:

Mijn sensordatasignalen zijn te zwak om zelfs maar een analyse te maken. Daarom heb ik versterking van de signalen nodig

Waar ik een vlakke lijn zou verwachten, zien de gegevens eruit als een puinhoop door interferentie en andere vervuiling. Ik moet de gegevens eerst opschonen voordat ik ze analyseer.

Waarschijnlijk heb je tot nu toe dagen of zelfs weken gewerkt aan signaalanalyse en filtering. Het ontwikkelingstraject is over het algemeen langzaam en zeer pijnlijk. Denk maar eens aan het aantal uren dat je had kunnen besparen als je een ontwerptool had gehad die alle algoritmische details voor jou beheerde. ASN Filter Designer is een standaardoplossing voor de industrie die wordt gebruikt door duizenden professionele ontwikkelaars die wereldwijd aan iot-projecten werken.

Onze nauwe samenwerking met Arm en ST zorgt ervoor dat alle ontworpen filters 100% compatibel zijn met alle Arm Cortex-M processoren, zoals de populaire STM32-familie van ST.

Uitdagingen voor ingenieurs

90% van IoT smart sensors zijn gebaseerd op Arm Cortex-M processor technologie

Sensor signal processing is moeilijk

Sensoren hebben moeite met interferentie en allerlei ongewenste componenten

Hoe ontwerp ik een filter dat voldoet aan mijn requirements?

Hoe kan ik mijn ontworpen filter controleren op testdata?

Voor betere product performance is schone sensor data nodig

Tijdrovend proces om een filter op een embedded processor te implementeren

Tijd is geld!

Ontwerpers verzanden vaak met traditionele tooling. Deze vereist meestal een iteratieve, trial and error aanpak of deskundige kennis. Met deze aanpak gaat kostbare tijd verloren. ASN Filter Designer helpt u met een interactieve ontwerpmethode. Hierbij voert de tool automatisch de technische specificaties in op basis van eisen die de gebruiker grafisch heeft ingevoerd.

Snelle ontwikkeling van het DSP-algoritme

Volledig gevalideerd filterontwerp: geschikt voor toepassing in DSP, microcontroller, FPGA, ASIC of PC-toepassing

Automatische gedetailleerde ontwerpdocumentatie: de Filter Designer helpt je met documenatie, waardoor je de peer review kunt versnellen en projectrisico’s verlaagt

Eenvoudige overdracht: projectdossier, documentatie en testresultaten bieden een gemakkelijk manier voor overdracht aan collega’s of andere teams

Gemakkelijk in te passen in nieuwe scenario’s: het ontwerp kan eenvoudig worden aangepast aan andere eisen en scenario’s, zoals 60Hz interferentieonderdrukking op de voedingslijn, in plaats van de Europese 50Hz.

ASN Filter Designer: de snelle en intuitieve filter designer

De ASN Filter Designer is het ideale hulpmiddel om sensorgegevens snel te analyseren en filteren. Indien nodig kun je jouw gegevens eenvoudig naar tools als Matlab en Python exporteren voor verdere analyse. Daarom is het ideaal voor ingenieurs die een krachtige tool voor signaalanalyse nodig hebben en een datafilter voor hun IOT-toepassing moeten maken. Zeker als je af en toe een datafilter moet maken. Vergeleken met andere tools creeer je een algoritme binnen enkele uren in plaats van dagen.

Exporteer jouw algoritmes eenvoudig naar Matlab, Python, C++ en Arm

Je kunt veel tijd besparen doordat je met ASN Filter Designer algoritmes eenvoudig kunt implementeren in Matlab, Python, C++ of direct op een arm-microcontroller omdat de Filter Designer automatisch code generateert.

Onmiddelijke verlichting

Denk eens aan het aantal uren dat je had kunnen besparen als je een ontwerptool had gehad die alle algoritmische details voor je beheerde.

ASN Filter Designer is een standaardoplossing in de sector die wordt gebruikt door duizenden professionele ontwikkelaars die wereldwijd aan ivd-projecten werken. Onze nauwe samenwerking met Arm en ST zorgt ervoor dat alle filters 100% compatibel zijn met alle Arm Cortex-M processoren.

Hoeveel pijnverzachting kun je voor 125 Euro kopen?

Omdat veel technici onze ASN Filterontwerper voor korte tijd nodig hebben, is een licentie van 125 euro voor slechts 3 maanden mogelijk!

Vraag jezelf maar af: is 125 Euro een eerlijke prijs om te betalen voor onmiddellijke pijnverlichting en resultaat? Wij denken van wel. Bovendien hebben we een licentie voor 1 jaar en zelfs een eeuwigdurende licentie. Download de demo om het zelf te zien of neem contact met ons op voor meer informatie

What are Finite Impulse Respsonse (FIR) Filters? And how to design FIR Filters in ASN Filter Designer and which filters does ASN Filter Designer support?

https://www.advsolned.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Direct-Form.png11151050adminhttps://www.advsolned.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ASN_logo.jpgadmin2020-08-22 14:30:522020-08-31 13:48:14How to design FIR Filters in ASN Filter Designer

https://www.advsolned.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Worker-pipelines.jpg9981500adminhttps://www.advsolned.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ASN_logo.jpgadmin2020-07-27 13:06:402020-08-25 16:42:46How DSP for oil, gas and flow measurement can benefit from the ASN Filter Designer

DSP for engineers: the ASN Filter Designer is the ideal tool to analyze and filter the sensor data quickly. Create an algorithm within hours instead of days. When you are working with sensor data, you probably recognize these challenges:

My sensor data signals are too weak to even make an analysis. So, strengthening of the signals is needed

Where I would expect a flat line, the data looks like a mess because of interference and other containments. I need to clean the data first before analysis

Until now, you’ve probably spent days or even weeks working on your signal analysis and filtering? The development trajectory is generally slow and very painful.

In fact, just think about the number of hours that you could have saved if you had design tool that managed all of the algorithmic details for you. ASN Filter Designer is an industry standard solution used by thousands of professional developers worldwide working on IoT projects.

Our close collaboration with Arm and ST ensures that all designed filters are 100% compatible with all Arm Cortex-M processors, such as ST’s popular STM32 family.

Challenges for engineers

90% of IoT smart sensors are based on Arm Cortex-M processor technology

Sensor signal processing is difficult

Sensors have trouble with all kinds of interference and undesirable components

How do I design a filter that meets my requirements?

How can I verify my designed filter on test data?

Clean sensor data is required for better product performance

Time consuming process to implement a filter on an embedded processor

Time is money!

Designers hit a ‘brick wall’ with traditional tooling. Standard tooling requires an iterative, trial and error approach or expert knowledge. Using this approach, a considerable amount of valuable engineering time is wasted. ASN Filter Designer helps you with an interactive method of design, whereby the tool automatically enters the technical specifications based on the graphical user requirements.

Fast DSP algorithm development

Fully validated filter design: suitable for deployment in DSP, micro-controller, FPGA, ASIC or PC application.

Automatic detailed design documentation: expediting peer review and lowing project risks by helping the designer create a paper trail.

Simple handover: project file, documentation and test results provide a painless route for handover to colleagues or other teams.

Easily accommodate other scenarios in the future: Design may be simply modified in the future to accommodate other requirements and scenarios, such as 60Hz powerline interference cancellation, instead of the European 50Hz.

ASN Filter Designer: the fast and intuitive filter designer

The ASN Filter Designer is the ideal tool to analyze and filter the sensor data quickly. When needed, you can easily deploy your data for further analyze for tools such as Matlab and Python. As such it’s ideal for engineers who need and powerful signal analyser and need to create a data filter for their IoT application. Certainly, when you have to create data filtering once in a while. Compared to other tools, you can create an algorithm within hours instead of days.

Easily deploy your algorithms to Matlab, Python, C++ and Arm

A big timesaver of the ASN Filter Designer is that you can easily deploy your algorithms to Matlab, Python, C++ or directly on an Arm microcontroller with the automatic code generators.

Instant pain relief

Just think about the number of hours that you could have saved if you had design tool that managed all of the algorithmic details for you.

ASN Filter Designer is an industry standard solution used by thousands of professional developers worldwide working on IoT projects. Our close collaboration with Arm and ST ensures that the all filters are 100% compatible with all Arm Cortex-M processors.

How much pain relief can 125 Euro buy you?

Because a lot of engineers need our ASN Filter Designer for a short time, a 125 Euro license for just 3 months is possible!

Just ask yourself: is 125 Euro a fair price to pay for instant pain relief and results? We think so. Besides, we have a license for 1 year and even a perpetual license. Download the demo to see for yourself or contact us for more information.

A digital filter is a mathematical algorithm that operates on a digital dataset (e.g. sensor data) in order extract information of interest and remove any unwanted information. Applications of this type of technology, include removing glitches from sensor data or even cleaning up noise on a measured signal for easier data analysis. But how do we choose the best type of digital filter for our application? And what are the differences between a IIR filter and a FIR filter?

Digital filters are divided into the following two categories:

Infinite impulse response (IIR)

Finite impulse response (FIR)

As the names suggest, each type of filter is categorised by the length of its impulse response. However, before beginning with a detailed mathematical analysis, it is prudent to appreciate the differences in performance and characteristics of each type of filter.

Example

In order to illustrate the differences between an IIR and FIR, the frequency response of a 14th order FIR (solid line), and a 4th order Chebyshev Type I IIR (dashed line) is shown below in Figure 1. Notice that although the magnitude spectra have a similar degree of attenuation, the phase spectrum of the IIR filter is non-linear in the passband (\(\small 0\rightarrow7.5Hz\)), and becomes very non-linear at the cut-off frequency, \(\small f_c=7.5Hz\). Also notice that the FIR requires a higher number of coefficients (15 vs the IIR’s 10) to match the attenuation characteristics of the IIR.

These are just some of the differences between the two types of filters. A detailed summary of the main advantages and disadvantages of each type of filter will now follow.

IIR filters

IIR (infinite impulse response) filters are generally chosen for applications where linear phase is not too important and memory is limited. They have been widely deployed in audio equalisation, biomedical sensor signal processing, IoT/IIoT smart sensors and high-speed telecommunication/RF applications.

Advantages

Low implementation cost: requires less coefficients and memory than FIR filters in order to satisfy a similar set of specifications, i.e., cut-off frequency and stopband attenuation.

Low latency: suitable for real-time control and very high-speed RF applications by virtue of the low number of coefficients.

Analog equivalent: May be used for mimicking the characteristics of analog filters using s-z plane mapping transforms.

Disadvantages

Non-linear phase characteristics: The phase charactersitics of an IIR filter are generally nonlinear, especially near the cut-off frequencies. All-pass equalisation filters can be used in order to improve the passband phase characteristics.

More detailed analysis: Requires more scaling and numeric overflow analysis when implemented in fixed point. The Direct form II filter structure is especially sensitive to the effects of quantisation, and requires special care during the design phase.

Numerical stability: Less numerically stable than their FIR (finite impulse response) counterparts, due to the feedback paths.

FIR filters

FIR (finite impulse response) filters are generally chosen for applications where linear phase is important and a decent amount of memory and computational performance are available. They have a widely deployed in audio and biomedical signal enhancement applications. Their all-zero structure (discussed below) ensures that they never become unstable for any type of input signal, which gives them a distinct advantage over the IIR.

Advantages

Linear phase: FIRs can be easily designed to have linear phase. This means that no phase distortion is introduced into the signal to be filtered, as all frequencies are shifted in time by the same amount – thus maintaining their relative harmonic relationships (i.e. constant group and phase delay). This is certainly not case with IIR filters, that have a non-linear phase characteristic.

Stability: As FIRs do not use previous output values to compute their present output, i.e. they have no feedback, they can never become unstable for any type of input signal, which is gives them a distinct advantage over IIR filters.

Arbitrary frequency response: The Parks-McClellan and ASN FilterScript’s firarb() function allow for the design of an FIR with an arbitrary magnitude response. This means that an FIR can be customised more easily than an IIR.

Fixed point performance: the effects of quantisation are less severe than that of an IIR.

Disadvantages

High computational and memory requirement: FIRs usually require many more coefficients for achieving a sharp cut-off than their IIR counterparts. The consequence of this is that they require much more memory and significantly a higher amount of MAC (multiple and accumulate) operations. However, modern microcontroller architectures based on the Arm’s Cortex-M cores now include DSP hardware support via SIMD (signal instruction, multiple data) that expedite the filtering operation significantly.

Higher latency: the higher number of coefficients, means that in general an FIR is less suitable than an IIR for fast high throughput applications. This becomes problematic for real-time closed-loop control applications, where an FIR filter may have too much group delay to achieve loop stability.

No analog equivalent: using the Bilinear, matched z-transform (s-z mapping), an analog filter can be easily be transformed into an equivalent IIR filter. However, this is not possible for an FIR as it has no analog equivalent.

Mathematical definitions

As discussed in the introduction, the name IIR and FIR originate from the mathematical definitions of each type of filter, i.e. an IIR filter is categorised by its theoretically infinite impulse response,

Practically speaking, it is not possible to compute the output of an IIR using this equation. Therefore, the equation may be re-written in terms of a finite number of poles \(\small p\) and zeros \(\small q\), as defined by the linear constant coefficient difference equation given by:

where, \(\small a_k\) and \(\small b_k\) are the filter’s denominator and numerator polynomial coefficients, who’s roots are equal to the filter’s poles and zeros respectively. Thus, a relationship between the difference equation and the z-transform (transfer function) may therefore be defined by using the z-transform delay property such that,

As seen, the transfer function is a frequency domain representation of the filter. Notice also that the poles act on the outputdata, and the zeros on the inputdata. Since the poles act on the output data, and affect stability, it is essential that their radii remain inside the unit circle (i.e. <1) for BIBO (bounded input, bounded output) stability. The radii of the zeros are less critical, as they do not affect filter stability. This is the primary reason why all-zero FIR (finite impulse response) filters are always stable.

BIBO stability

A linear time invariant (LTI) system (such as a digital filter) is said to be bounded input, bounded output stable, or BIBO stable, if every bounded input gives rise to a bounded output, as

Where, \(\small h(k)\) is the LTI system’s impulse response. Analyzing this equation, it should be clear that the BIBO stability criterion will only be satisfied if the system’s poles lie inside the unit circle, since the system’s ROC (region of convergence) must include the unit circle. Consequently, it is sufficient to say that a bounded input signal will always produce a bounded output signal if all the poles lie inside the unit circle.

The zeros on the other hand, are not constrained by this requirement, and as a consequence may lie anywhere on z-plane, since they do not directly affect system stability. Therefore, a system stability analysis may be undertaken by firstly calculating the roots of the transfer function (i.e., roots of the numerator and denominator polynomials) and then plotting the corresponding poles and zeros upon the z-plane.

An interesting situation arises if any poles lie on the unit circle, since the system is said to be marginally stable, as it is neither stable or unstable. Although marginally stable systems are not BIBO stable, they have been exploited by digital oscillator designers, since their impulse response provides a simple method of generating sine waves, which have proved to be invaluable in the field of telecommunications.

Biquad IIR filters

The IIR filter implementation discussed herein is said to be biquad, since it has two poles and two zeros as illustrated below in Figure 2. The biquad implementation is particularly useful for fixed point implementations, as the effects of quantization and numerical stability are minimised. However, the overall success of any biquad implementation is dependent upon the available number precision, which must be sufficient enough in order to ensure that the quantised poles are always inside the unit circle.

Figure 2: Direct Form I (biquad) IIR filter realization and transfer function.

Analysing Figure 2, it can be seen that the biquad structure is actually comprised of two feedback paths (scaled by \(\small a_1\) and \(\small a_2\)), three feed forward paths (scaled by \(\small b_0, b_1\) and \(\small b_2\)) and a section gain, \(\small K\). Thus, the filtering operation of Figure 1 can be summarised by the following simple recursive equation:

Analysing the equation, notice that the biquad implementation only requires four additions (requiring only one accumulator) and five multiplications, which can be easily accommodated on any Cortex-M microcontroller. The section gain, \(\small K\) may also be pre-multiplied with the forward path coefficients before implementation.

A collection of Biquad filters is referred to as a Biquad Cascade, as illustrated below.

The ASN Filter Designer can design and implement a cascade of up to 50 biquads (Professional edition only).

Floating point implementation

When implementing a filter in floating point (i.e. using double or single precision arithmetic) Direct Form II structures are considered to be a better choice than the Direct Form I structure. The Direct Form II Transposed structure is considered the most numerically accurate for floating point implementation, as the undesirable effects of numerical swamping are minimised as seen by analysing the difference equations.

Figure 3 – Direct Form II Transposed strucutre, transfer function and difference equations

The filter summary (shown in Figure 4) provides the designer with a detailed overview of the designed filter, including a detailed summary of the technical specifications and the filter coefficients, which presents a quick and simple route to documenting your design.

The ASN Filter Designer supports the design and implementation of both single section and Biquad (default setting) IIR filters.

Figure 4: detailed specification.

FIR definition

Returning the IIR’s linear constant coefficient difference equation, i.e.

Notice that when we set the \(\small a_k\) coefficients (i.e. the feedback) to zero, the definition reduces to our original the FIR filter definition, meaning that the FIR computation is just based on past and present inputs values, namely:

\(\displaystyle y(n)=\sum_{k=0}^{q}b_kx(n-k) \)

Implementation

Although several practical implementations for FIRs exist, the direct formstructure and its transposed cousin are perhaps the most commonly used, and as such, all designed filter coefficients are intended for implementation in a Direct form structure.

The Direct form structure and associated difference equation are shown below. The Direct Form is advocated for fixed point implementation by virtue of the single accumulator concept.

The recommended (default) structure within the ASN Filter Designer is the Direct Form Transposed structure, as this offers superior numerical accuracy when using floating point arithmetic. This can be readily seen by analysing the difference equations below (used for implementation), as the undesirable effects of numerical swamping are minimised, since floating point addition is performed on numbers of similar magnitude.

Digital filters are divided into the following two categories:

Infinite impulse response (IIR)

Finite impulse response (FIR)

IIR (infinite impulse response) filters are generally chosen for applications where linear phase is not too important and memory is limited. They have been widely deployed in audio equalisation, biomedical sensor signal processing, IoT/IIoT smart sensors and high-speed telecommunication/RF applications.

FIR (finite impulse response) filters are generally chosen for applications where linear phase is important and a decent amount of memory and computational performance are available. They have a widely deployed in audio and biomedical signal enhancement applications.

ASN Filter Designer provides engineers with everything they need to design, experiment and deploy complex IIR and FIR digital filters for a variety of sensor measurement applications. These advantages coupled with automatic documentation and code generation functionality allow engineers to design and validate an IIR/FIR digital filter within minutes rather than hours.

https://www.advsolned.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/fir_iir.png453622adminhttps://www.advsolned.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ASN_logo.jpgadmin2020-04-28 13:35:442020-09-14 19:40:03Difference between IIR and FIR filters: a practical design guide

After downloading the ASN Filter Designer, most people just want to play with the tool, in order to get a feeling of whether it works for them. But how do you get started with the ASN Filter Designer? Based on some great user feedback, ASNFD v4.4 now comes with the UI experience 2020 pack. This pack includes detailed coaching tips, an enhanced user experience and step-by-step instructions to get you started with your design.

A quick overview of the ASN Filter Designer v4.4 is given below, and we’re sure that you’ll agree that it’s an awesome tool for DSP IIR/FIR digital filter design!

The ASN Filter Designer has a fast, intuitive user interface. Interactively design, validate and deploy your digital filter within minutes rather than hours. However, getting started with DSP Filter Design can be difficult, especially when you don’t have deep knowledge of digital signal processing. Most people just want to experiment with a tool to get a feeling whether it works for them (sure, there are tutorials and videos). But where do you start?

Start experimenting with filter design immediately

That’s why we have developed the UI Experience 2020 pack. Based on user feedback, we’ve created detailed tooltips and animations of key functionality. Within minutes, you’ll get a kick-start into functionalities such as chart zooming, panning and design markers.

Coaching tips, enhanced user experience, step-by-step instructions

Based on user feedback, the UI Experience 2020 pack includes:

Extensive coaching tips

Detailed explanations of design methods and types of filters

Enhanced user experience:

cursors

animations

visual effects

Short cuts to detailed worked solutions, tutorials and step-by-step instructions

Feedback from the user community has been very positive indeed! By providing detailed tooltips and animations of key functionality, the initial hurdle of designing a filter with your desired specifications has now been significantly simplified.

So start with the ASN Filter Designer right away, and cut your development costs by up to 75%!

Modern embedded processors, software frameworks and design tooling now allow engineers to apply advanced measurement concepts to smart factories as part of the I4.0 revolution.

In recent years, PM (predictive maintenance) of machines has received great attention, as factories look to maximise their production efficiency while at the same time retaining the invaluable skills of experienced foremen and production workers.

Traditionally, a foreman would walk around the shop floor and listen to the sounds a machine would make to get an idea of impending failure. With the advent of I4.0 technology, microphones, edge DSP algorithms and ML may now be employed in order to ‘listen’ to the sounds a machine makes and then make a classification and prediction.

One of the major challenges is how to make a computer hear like a human.

Physics of the human ear

An illustration of the human ear shown on the right. As seen, the basic task of the ear is to translate sound (air vibration) into electrical nerve impulses for the brain to interpret.

An illustration of the human ear shown on the right. As seen, the basic task of the ear is to translate sound (air vibration) into electrical nerve impulses for the brain to interpret.

How does it work?

The ear achieves this via three bones (Stapes, Incus and Malleus) that act as a mechanical amplifier for vibrations received at the eardrum. These amplified sounds are then passed onto the Cochlea via the Oval window (not shown). The Cochlea (shown in purple) is filled with a fluid that moves in response to the vibrations from the oval window. As the fluid moves, thousands of nerve endings are set into motion. These nerve endings transform sound vibrations into electrical impulses that travel along the auditory nerve fibres to the brain for analysis.

Modelling perceived sound

Due to complexity of the fluidic mechanical construction of the human auditory system, low and high frequencies are typically not discernible. Researchers over the years have found that humans are most perceptive to sounds in the 1-6kHz range, although this range varies according to the subject’s physical health.

This research led to the definition of a set of weighting curves: the so-called A, B, C and D weighting curves, which equalises a microphone’s frequency response. These weighting curves aim to bring the digital and physical worlds closer together by allowing a computerised microphone-based system to hear like a human.

The A-weighing curve is the most widely used as it is mandated by IEC-61672 to be fitted to all sound level meters. The B and D curves are hardly ever used, but C-weighting may be used for testing the impact of noise in telecoms systems.

The frequency response of the A-weighting curve is shown above, where it can be seen that sounds entering our ears are de-emphasised below 500Hz and are most perceptible between 0.5-6kHz. Notice that the curve is unspecified above 20kHz, as this exceeds the human hearing range.

ASN FilterScript

ASN’s FilterScript symbolic math scripting language offers designers the ability to take an analog filter transfer function and transform it to its digital equivalent with just a few lines of code.

The analog transfer functions of the A and C-weighting curves are given below:

\(H_A(s) \approx \displaystyle{7.39705×10^9 \cdot s^4 \over (s + 129.4)^2\quad(s + 676.7)\quad (s + 4636)\quad (s + 76655)^2}\)

\(H_C(s) \approx \displaystyle{5.91797×10^9 \cdot s^2\over(s + 129.4)^2\quad (s + 76655)^2}\)

These analog transfer functions may be transformed into their digital equivalents via the bilinear() function. However, notice that \(H_A(s) \) requires a significant amount of algebracic manipulation in order to extract the denominator cofficients in powers of \(s\).

Convolution

A simple trick to perform polynomial multiplication is to use linear convolution, which is the same algebraic operation as multiplying two polynomials together. This may be easily performed via Filterscript’s conv() function, as follows:

y=conv(a,b);

As a simple example, the multiplication of \((s^2+2s+10)\) with \((s+5)\), would be defined as the following three lines of FilterScript code:

a={1,2,10};
b={1,5};
y=conv(a,b);

which yields, 1 7 20 50 or \((s^3+7s^2+20s+50)\)

For the A-weighting curve Laplace transfer function, the complete FilterScript code is given below:

ClearH1; // clear primary filter from cascade
Main() // main loop
a={1, 129.4};
b={1, 676.7};
c={1, 4636};
d={1, 76655};
aa=conv(a,a); // polynomial multiplication
dd=conv(d,d);
aab=conv(aa,b);
aabc=conv(aab,c);
Na=conv(aabc,dd);
Nb = {0 ,0 , 1 ,0 ,0 , 0, 0}; // define numerator coefficients
G = 7.397e+09; // define gain
Ha = analogtf(Nb, Na, G, "symbolic");
Hd = bilinear(Ha,0, "symbolic");
Num = getnum(Hd);
Den = getden(Hd);
Gain = getgain(Hd)/computegain(Hd,1e3); // set gain to 0dB@1kHz

Frequency response of analog vs digital A-weighting filter for \(f_s=48kHz\). As seen, the digital equivalent magnitude response matches the ideal analog magnitude response very closely until \(6kHz\).

The ITU-R 486–4 weighting curve

Another weighting curve of interest is the ITU-R 486–4 weighting curve, developed by the BBC. Unlike the A-weighting filter, the ITU-R 468–4 curve describes subjective loudness for broadband stimuli. The main disadvantage of the A-weighting curve is that it underestimates the loudness judgement of real-world stimuli particularly in the frequency band from about 1–9 kHz.

Due to the precise definition of the 486–4 weighting curve, there is no analog transfer function available. Instead the standard provides a table of amplitudes and frequencies – see here. This specification may be directly entered into Filterscript’s firarb() function for designing a suitable FIR filter, as shown below:

Frequency response of an ITU-R 468-4 FIR filter designed with Filterscript’s firarb() function for \(f_s=48kHz\)

As seen, FilterScript provides the designer with a very powerful symbolic scripting language for designing weighting curve filters. The following discussion now focuses on deployment of the A-weighting filter to an Arm based processor via the tool’s automatic code generator. The concepts and steps demonstrated below are equally valid for FIR filters.

Automatic code generation to Arm processor cores via CMSIS-DSP

The ASN Filter Designer’s automatic code generation engine facilitates the export of a designed filter to Cortex-M Arm based processors via the CMSIS-DSP software framework. The tool’s built-in analytics and help functions assist the designer in successfully configuring the design for deployment.

Before generating the code, the H2 filter (i.e. the filter designed in FilterScript) needs to be firstly re-optimised (transformed) to an H1 filter (main filter) structure for deployment. The options menu can be found under the P-Z tab in the main UI.

All floating point IIR filters designs must be based on Single Precision arithmetic and either a Direct Form I or Direct Form II Transposed filter structure. The Direct Form II Transposed structure is advocated for floating point implementation by virtue of its higher numerically accuracy.

Quantisation and filter structure settings can be found under the Q tab (as shown on the left). Setting Arithmetic to Single Precision and Structure to Direct Form II Transposed and clicking on the Apply button configures the IIR considered herein for the CMSIS-DSP software framework.

Select the Arm CMSIS-DSP framework from the selection box in the filter summary window:

The automatically generated C code based on the CMSIS-DSP framework for direct implementation on an Arm based Cortex-M processor is shown below:

As seen, the ASN Filter Designer’s automatic code generator generates all initialisation code, scaling and data structures needed to implement the A-weighting filter IIR filter via Arm’s CMSIS-DSP library.

https://www.advsolned.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/aweightingcurve.png420560adminhttps://www.advsolned.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ASN_logo.jpgadmin2019-10-03 21:22:482020-06-09 15:21:25A-weighting equalisation: Designing and deploying to Arm Cortex-M devices